In the ever-evolving landscape of economics and financial investments, one question that often arises is whether owning a home or having cash savings is a better long-term strategyThe answer to this question can shape financial decisions for individuals and families alike, especially as various economic factors come into playRecently, there has been considerable speculation regarding the trajectory of real estate prices amidst a backdrop of monetary easing and institutional forecasts suggesting stabilization in housing marketsThis leads to the profound inquiry: five years from now, will a million-dollar home be worth more, or will a million-dollar savings account hold greater value?

To understand the dynamics behind this question, we must first consider the two pivotal aspects influencing the preservation of wealth through savings: interest rates on deposits and the potential for currency depreciation

Presently, it is clear that interest rates are on a downward trendA few years ago, major banks offered rates on large deposits exceeding 4%, while standard fixed deposits hovered around the 3% markFast forward to 2022, and these rates had dwindled to around 3%. However, as we move into the current year, rates have plummeted to the low 1% range, with further reductions anticipated in the futureThis shift highlights an alarming reality—money parked in savings accounts is accruing less interest over time, significantly slowing wealth accumulation.

The worry of currency devaluation has also garnered attention, particularly in the context of extensive monetary supply increasesThe overwhelming influx of newly printed money raises the specter of inflationYet, the reality is complexInstead of boosting asset prices across the board, we find ourselves in a situation where stock markets remain volatile and the real estate sector appears stagnant as consumers refrain from spending

• Leap Motor Boosts Profitability Among New Car Makers
• ETF Assets Surpass 200 Billion
• Call for Lower Hong Kong Stock Connect Dividend Tax
• MiniMax Takes a Key Step in AI Commercialization
• Why Are Banks Hesitant to Lower Interest Rates Again?

The anticipated inflationary effects of monetary easing seem to be losing their potency as individuals hoard cash instead of splurging on productsIn simpler terms, while monetary expansion should theoretically drive asset prices up, the current climate suggests that consumption patterns are curbing this expected response.

To illustrate this point further, consider the economic journey of Japan during the late 20th centuryFrom 1985 to 1990, the Japanese economy experienced a spectacular surge, dramatically elevating both property and stock market pricesTokyo's land values soared to levels surpassing those in the entire United States, with the stock market reaching historic peaksThis frenzy led many to either invest heavily or borrow significant sums to capitalize on the burgeoning marketHowever, as we moved into 1991, a cocktail of factors—including currency appreciation, monetary policy misjudgments, and abrupt taxation on land—culminated in a catastrophic burst of the economic bubble, plunging Japan into what is often referred to as the “lost decades.”

Beginning in 1995, the Bank of Japan initiated unprecedented monetary expansion in hopes of stimulating economic growth

Strangely, the newly issued currency failed to elevate property or price levels, instead contributing to a scenario of widespread deflationThis deflationary spiral only exacerbated the burden of debt, as the actual debt amounts remained unchanged, but fell heavier as prices for goods and services dropped.

So why did printing money lead to deflation instead of inflation? The answer lies in the economic context preceding the bubble's collapseYears of aggressive lending meant that many consumers were heavily indebted due to speculative investments in real estateFollowing the bubble burst, these assets devalued sharply, leaving debtors in a precarious positionIn essence, Japan's government could not allow the entire population to default on their debts, necessitating a long, drawn-out process of deleveragingConsequently, the excessive liquidity that flooded the economy did not foster consumption or tangible investments but rather ended up being siphoned off to pay down previous debts, resulting in a throttled economic environment.

The parallels with our contemporary economic situation are alarming

Even after a suite of measures to reform the financing system, implement monetary easing, and invest in infrastructure were put in place, it took Japan years to overcome the negative legacies of bad loansRemarkably, by 2021—three decades after the original lending boom—only then did individuals who had originally borrowed to purchase homes finally finish repaying their debts, cautiously re-entering the consumer landscapeThis so-called “lost two decades” has indelibly shaped an entire generation, demonstrating the profound impact economic fluctuations can have on societal evolution.

In contemplating whether we, too, may enter a protracted phase of stalled growth, it is vital to recognize that the unique structural qualities of our economy distinguish it from Japan’s experienceVarious factors—including the pace of industry upgrades, fiscal policies, and demographic statistics—all shape the potential futures of our housing market

Over the next few years, while overall market growth appears to be slowing, certain niche sectors—like core urban areas in major cities or burgeoning suburban technology parks—seem to preserve opportunities for appreciation.

However, the stark realization remains that, particularly in urban centers and desirable secondary cities, the price tags attached to properties command staggering amountsFor a cash holder considering purchasing real estate, it often seems that a million-dollar savings account cannot match the ever-increasing values of properties, especially given the income-to-price ratios that stand abysmally low for average familiesAccording to recent data, cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou exhibit income-to-price ratios of 41, 32, 28, and 32, respectivelyThis disheartening disparity places severe pressure on families already grappling with financial burdens related to housing costs.

As the market enters this new phase, it becomes apparent that speculative investments may no longer hold water